<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" ><channel><title>London Photographers&#039; Branch &#187; I&#8217;m a Photographer Not a Terrorist</title> <atom:link href="http://londonphotographers.org/tag/im-a-photographer-not-a-terrorist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://londonphotographers.org</link> <description>Run by Photographers, for Photographers</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 19:36:11 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <atom:link rel="search" href="http://londonphotographers.org/opensearch" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" title="Content Search" /> <item><title>Victory Flashmob – Section 44 is Dead!</title><link>http://londonphotographers.org/2010/07/victory-flashmob-section-44-is-dead/</link> <comments>http://londonphotographers.org/2010/07/victory-flashmob-section-44-is-dead/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 14:15:07 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Jonathan Warren</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Event]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Flashmob]]></category> <category><![CDATA[I'm a Photographer Not a Terrorist]]></category> <category><![CDATA[New Scotland Yard]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Press Freedom]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Section 44]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Terror Laws]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://londonphotographers.org/?p=710</guid> <description><![CDATA[We&#8217;ll be supporting this event on Sunday organised by I&#8217;m a Photographer, Not a Terrorist! Yesterday the European Court of Human Rights rejected the governments appeal to it’s decision in January that ruled Section 44 of the Terrorism Act 2000 in breach of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Although the Home Office has [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ll be supporting this event on Sunday organised by <a href="http://photographernotaterrorist.org">I&#8217;m a Photographer, Not a Terrorist!</a></p><blockquote><p><a href="http://PhotographerNotaTerrorist.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/victory-poster-A4.png"><img class="alignleft" style="margin-right: 10px;" title="victory-poster-A4" src="http://PhotographerNotaTerrorist.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/victory-poster-A4-212x300.png" alt="" width="212" height="300" /></a>Yesterday the European Court of Human Rights rejected the governments appeal to <a href="http://cmiskp.echr.coe.int/tkp197/view.asp?action=html&amp;documentId=860909&amp;portal=hbkm&amp;source=externalbydocnumber">it’s decision in January</a> that ruled Section 44 of the Terrorism Act 2000 in breach of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_8_of_the_European_Convention_on_Human_Rights">Article 8</a> of the European Convention on Human Rights.</p><p>Although the Home Office has said it is <a href="http://www.bjp-online.com/british-journal-of-photography/news/1720064/european-court-rejects-home-office-appeal-section-44-illegal">still considering</a> how the ruling effects the law and the police will continue to use it. It’s possible that any Stop &amp; Search under s44 since 12th January 2010 will be open to legal challenge, so hang on to any receipts.</p><p>Unfortunately there are still a swathe of laws that police use to harass photographers, most notably s43, which is similar to s44 but requires an officer to suspect that you are a terrorist and s76 which makes it illegal to ‘elicit information about a police officer’ which includes photographing them.</p><p>In the meantime we’re going back to the place where our campaign started, outside New Scotland Yard. We’ll be gathering at <strong>12 noon</strong>, this <strong>Sunday 4th July</strong> (Independence Day!) Come along and lets celebrate a little more freedom for photographers.</p></blockquote><p style="text-align: center;"><img class="icon" title="Facebook" src="http://facebook.com/favicon.ico" alt="" width="16" height="16" /><a href="http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid= 135958829755125">Facebook Event</a> <img class="icon" title="Google Map" src="http://maps.google.com/favicon.ico" alt="" width="16" height="16" /> <a href="http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?f=q&amp;source=s_q&amp;hl=en&amp;geocode=&amp;q=8-10+Broadway,+Westminster,+London+SW1H+0BG%E2%80%8E&amp;sll=51.498712,-0.133494&amp;sspn=0.002805,0.003551&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;hq=&amp;hnear=New+Scotland+Yard,+8-10+Broadway,+London+SW1H+0BG,+United+Kingdom&amp;ll=51.498658,-0.133531&amp;spn=0.011221,0.014205&amp;z=16">Google Map</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://londonphotographers.org/2010/07/victory-flashmob-section-44-is-dead/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Battle of the Beaches</title><link>http://londonphotographers.org/2010/06/battle-of-the-beaches/</link> <comments>http://londonphotographers.org/2010/06/battle-of-the-beaches/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 11:14:25 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Jess Hurd</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Beach]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Bournemouth]]></category> <category><![CDATA[I'm a Photographer Not a Terrorist]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Poole Council]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Restrictions]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://londonphotographers.org/?p=634</guid> <description><![CDATA[Poole council has been forced into an embarrassing climbdown over it's beach policy restricting photographers after condemnation from photographers up and down the country.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poole Council has been forced into an embarrassing climbdown over it&#8217;s <a href="http://www.bournemouthecho.co.uk/news/8190519._Take_pictures_on_the_beach__Yo/">policy restricting photography</a> on beaches after condemnation from photographers up and down the country.</p><p><a href="http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/news/Photographers_force_beach_warden_climbdown_news_299038.html"><em>Amateur Photographer</em> reports</a> a fortnight after Hattie Miles, <em><a href="http://www.bournemouthecho.co.uk">Bournemouth Echo</a></em> photographer and <a href="http://www.nuj.org.uk/">NUJ</a> member was prevented from photographing on the beach by a beach warden on the grounds that she did not have a licence. The council has now clarified its position:</p><blockquote><p>We have reaffirmed the guidance given to beach wardens and they have been advised not to approach photographers and film-makers unless their activities present a risk to public safety or are likely to cause serious offence, disruption or obstruction to other beach users.</p></blockquote><p>This is a victory for common sense and press freedom. Hattie should be applauded for highlighting the issue and not allowing council bureaucracy to dictate what the media can and cannot photograph.</p><p>Photographers, amateur and professional are simply fed up with arbitrary restrictions and will defend our right to use a camera in any public place without being <a href="http://photographernotaterrorist.org/">harassed</a>.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://londonphotographers.org/2010/06/battle-of-the-beaches/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 20/23 queries in 0.338 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 377/392 objects using disk: basic

Served from: londonphotographers.org @ 2012-02-05 07:38:36 -->
